Sunday, October 12, 2014

8 Days a Week: The Sunday Sabbath



Those who have known me know that, though I do not often speak of musicians nowadays, growing up I was (and am always) a huge Beatles fan. In the year of my birth, 1965, they released one of their many classic recordings, "Eight Days a Week". However, the reader will have to read along in order to discover the significance of "8" and the Sunday Sabbath. I hope the read will be informative and motivating of positive action.

The question often arises, which day the Sabbath for Christians is. If we were to answer this question based solely on practice, then the answer would be "either the seventh day of the week or the first day, depending on the Christian Church." Certainly Christians were distinguished from the first century AD on by their observance of a Sunday Sabbath, but many Jewish Christians adhered or returned to a Saturday Sabbath (along with other aspects of the Mosaic Law), and in recent centuries many Christians have come to believe that the Sabbath should have remained on the Seventh day of the week. A careful examination of the issue is warranted.

Point 1: The Light of Day One vs. The Lights on the Fourth Day

The Book of Genesis records the Creation of the earth and its atmosphere, "heaven", in six periods called days. Genesis, chapter 1:3-5, begins the creative periods:

And God said, Let there be Light [Hebrew "'Or"]:
and there was Light.
And God saw the Light, that it was good:
and God divided the light from the darkness.
And God called the Light day,
and the darkness He called night.
And the evening and the morning were Day One.

Now the Hebrew language has a word for "first", but what is used here in Genesis 1:5 is "Day One" rather than the phrase "first day". All other days have ordinal numbers, "second day", "third day", "fourth day", etc. In English "Day One" is simply a synonym for "First Day". The same relationship is true in Hebrew, although the Hebrew construction allows for another understanding that is not admitted by the English construction. In Hebrew "Day One" can also be understood as "Day of (the) One". In order to convey a possessive relationship in English "of" would have to be employed. In Hebrew the two words are simply juxtaposed and the first noun is understood as belonging to the second, hence "Day of (the) One" is an allowable reading.

It should be noted that the "Light" of Day One is special. This "Light" ["'Or"] is separated from the darkness, and God sees the Light alone, not the darkness, as "good". In the narrative of Genesis 1, "Light" ["'Or"] appears on Day One, but the sun, moon and stars shine through the atmosphere for the first time on the Fourth Day. It should be noted that although in English the same word is employed for both types of light with the only difference being singular vs. plural, light : lights, in Hebrew the two types of light are denoted by different words: (Genesis 1:14)

And God said,
Let there be lights [moroth] in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night:
and let them be for signs,
and for seasons,
and for days,
and for years.

Scholars often point out what they deem to be an inherent incongruity in the Genesis narrative. On the third day all manner of plant life is made to grow, yet the sun, the primary source of nourishment for plant life, does not appear until the fourth day. However, there is a deeper teaching here, namely, that all plant life did enjoy the benefits of illumination, though that illumination came from a "Light" source powerful enough to separate Day from Night. That Light that lit the world from Day One on was "'Or". On the Fourth Day the normal illuminating function was carried by the sun, moon and stars, collectively referred to by the plural noun "moroth". As a side note, Genesis 1:3-5 may very well be the origin of the expression "Light of the World". As another side note, the Egyptians believed that the night represented death, and the new day represented resurrection. The same symbolism was later employed by the Israelites.

The prophet Isaiah foretold the day that the Prince of Peace would make His appearance in Galilee. (Isaiah 9:2)

(2) The people that walked in darkness have seen a great Light [Hebrew 'Or]: they that dwell in the land of the shadow of death, upon them hath the Light ['Or] shined.

It is noteworthy that even Isaiah, in describing the Advent of the Prince of Peace on earth, calls Him the Light, "'Or", the very same Light that appeared on Day One of Creation. This relationship between Genesis 1:3-5 and Isaiah is somewhat lost in translation, again, because in English "Light" [from the Hebrew 'Or] is identical to "light" [from the Hebrew "moroth"].

Point 2: The Seventh Day Commemorating The Completion of God's Work

As the Genesis narrative continues we see God "resting" on the Seventh Day. (Genesis 2:1-3)

Thus the heavens and the earth were finished,
and all the host of them.
And on the seventh day God ended His works which He had made;
and He rested on the Seventh Day from all His works which He had made.
And God blessed the Seventh Day,
and sanctified it: because in it He had rested from all His works
which God created and made.

First of all, translations usually read that God "ended his work". The Hebrew text, however, reads "works", and thus I see no need to deviate from the text.

The Book of Genesis is silent as to what significance in practice the Seventh Day had for early worship among the sons of Adam. Presumably the early Saints worshiped God on the Seventh Day, at least, I am willing to suppose that this may have been the case. But in point of fact, the first overt references to separating this day, the Seventh Day, from the rest of the days of the week, in order to use this day for expressing one's devotion to God, comes with the Law given to Moses. (Exodus 20:8,11)

Remember the Sabbath Day, to keep it holy.
Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy works:
But the Seventh Day is the Sabbath of  the LORD thy God:
in it thou shalt not do any work...
For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea
and all that in them is,
and rested the Seventh Day;
wherefore the LORD blessed the Sabbath Day,
and hallowed it.

It is interesting to note that God completed His works in six days and rested the following day. God also realizes that man is engaged in his own works, labors, and man will rest on the seventh day, not from having completed his works, but in honor of God's completing the creation of the earth and atmosphere and filling the earth with flora, fauna and the human family of (initially the great patriarch and matriarch) Adam and Eve. It is noteworthy that the Mosaic Sabbath was to celebrate God's completion of the creation of the world.

Point 3: Who Exactly Was Under the Law to Observe the Sabbath?

One often overlooked detail is that God commanded Israel to keep the Sabbath day, Israel and Israel alone: (Exodus 31:12-17)

And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,
Speak thou also unto the children of Israel, saying,
Verily my sign between me and you throughout your generations;
that ye may know that I am the LORD that doth sanctify you.
Ye shall keep the Sabbath therefore;
for it is holy unto you:
every one that denieth it shall surely be put to death:
for whosoever doeth any work therein,
that soul shall be cut off from among his people.
Six days may work be done;
but in the seventh is the Sabbath of rest,
holy to the LORD:
whosoever doeth any work in the Sabbath day,
he shall surely be put to death.
Wherefore the children of Israel shall keep the Sabbath,
to observe the Sabbath throughout their generations,
for an eternal covenant.
It is a sign between me and the children of Israel for ever:
for in six days the LORD made heaven and earth,
and on the seventh day He stopped, and breathed.

Here we see that the Lord commanded the children of Israel to keep the Sabbath Day, the Lord stated that the seventh day commemorated His resting just after His six days of works, and the Lord added that Sabbath Day observance is a perpetual covenant. The sign between the Lord and Israel is that Israel would mark the Day that the Lord stopped or completed the creation of this earth/atmosphere and "breathed".

An often overlooked detail in the issue of Sabbath Day observance is that it was Jesus Christ who created this earth, its atmosphere, and filled them with life, and Jesus assisted His Father in preparing the world for Adam and Eve. (John 1:3)

(3) All things were made by him;
and without him was not any thing made that was made.

The Seventh Day was, in essence, the day to commemorate Jesus Christ's completion of His great pre-mortal mission, that of creating this earth and making it inhabitable for humanity.

God the Father was the One who commanded, but it was Jesus Christ who came and performed the works of creation according to the will of The Father. Now, bearing in mind the great purpose of the Seventh Day Sabbath (to commemorate God's, that is, Jesus' completion of His works), notice what Isaiah says shall be said in that day, a future day of revelation that will follow a period in which The LORD had hid his face and not spoken to mankind (Isaiah 12:1-6):

(1) And in that day thou shalt say, O LORD, I will praise thee: though thou wast angry with me, thine anger is turned away, and thou comfortedst me.
(2) Behold, God is my salvation; I will trust, and not be afraid: for the LORD JEHOVAH is my strength and my song; he also is become my salvation.
(3) Therefore with joy shall ye draw water out of the wells of salvation.
(4) And in that day shall ye say, Praise the LORD, call upon his name, declare his doings among the people, make mention that his name is exalted.
(5) Sing unto the LORD; for he hath done excellent things: this is known in all the earth.
(6) Cry out and shout, thou inhabitant of Zion: for great is the Holy One of Israel in the midst of thee.

Notice the often overlooked detail, that in that day we shall speak of the things The Lord has done, for Jehovah has become our salvation. If God, Jesus, completed his work on the sixth day, how is it that in a future day we would sing and declare of what Jehovah, Jesus, has done as He has become our salvation? Isaiah is clear, namely, that it is because The Holy One of Israel will have been in our midst, even Jesus Christ, the Son of God. The Messiah was to come and do great works of salvation among the children of men, namely atone for the sins of the world and rise from the dead, and in that day we would commemorate the things He had just done.

Point 4: The First and The Seventh Days Bear Relationship in Worship

The Law was given to Moses after The Lord used Moses as His servant to deliver His people from 430 years in Egypt, a lengthy time that had seen the Israelites prosper and then be denied rights and property, ultimately being reduced to slavery.

In the Law of Moses or "The Law given to Moses" a celebration of Israel's deliverance out of Egypt was proscribed.

(11) And thus shall ye eat it; with your loins girded, your shoes on your feet, and your feet, and your staff in your hand; and ye shall eat it in haste: it is the LORD's passover.
(12) For I will pass through the land of Egypt this night, and will smite all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, both man and beast; and against all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgment: I am the LORD.
(14) And this day shall be unto you for a memorial; and ye shall keep it a feast to the LORD throughout your generations; ye shall keep it a feast by an ordinance for ever.
(15) Seven days shall ye eat unleavened bread; even the first day ye shall put away leaven out of your houses: for whosoever eateth leavened bread from the first day until the seventh day, that soul shall be cut off from Israel.
(16) And in the first day there shall be an holy convocation, and in the seventh day there shall be an holy convocation to you; no manner of work shall be done in them, save that which every man must eat, that only may be done of you.

The Passover thus was to be initiated by an holy convocation on the first day as well as concluded with an holy convocation on the seventh day. Though this factor may be legitimately seen simply as the collective convening and concluding of the celebration, it is interesting that the covenant people were to celebrate collectively on the first and seventh days, as if to demonstrate the significance of these days for worship.

Fifth Point: Jeremiah Points to a New Covenant and Isaiah Speaks of Rejected Sabbaths

Jeremiah was not just a great Old Testament prophet, he was the prophet who had the unenviable task of presiding over the apostasy and subsequent captivity of Judah. Notice what Jeremiah had to say of the rebellions of the House of Israel (at that time the defunct Northern Kingdom) and Judah (the soon to be captive nation) in Jeremiah 31:31-36:

(31) Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
(32) Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD:
(33) But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
(34) And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.
(35) Thus saith the LORD, which giveth the sun for Light ['Or] of His day [or "for Light by Day"], and the decreeth the moon and of the stars for Light ['Or] of night, which divideth the sea when the waves thereof roar; The LORD of hosts is his name:
(36) If those decrees depart from before me, saith the LORD, then the seed of Israel also shall cease from being a nation before me forever.

The prophet Jeremiah spoke of a day when The Lord would establish a new covenant with the House of Israel, and The Lord said that He was the One who had given the sun, moon and stars for Light ['Or]. Notice the departure from the word "moroth" which was the term used in Genesis to describe the physical luminaries of the sun, moon and stars. Here the sun, moon and stars are given to shine for the Light as a symbol of the Lord's decrees. Jeremiah pointed out that The Lord stated that if Israel would depart from those decrees of His, Israel would cease to be a nation. Do take notice that when The Lord mentioned "day" He said that the sun was given for Light ['Or] of His Day. Follow the logic: If The Lord has a Light ['Or] of His Day, and that Light ['Or] was known to have appeared on Day One, that would imply that Day One has the significance of being The Lord's Day. More on this point will follow.

The prophet Isaiah records The Lord rejecting the worship including Sabbaths of apostate Israel:

(11) To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? saith the LORD: I am full of the burnt offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; and I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he goats.
(12) When ye come to appear before me, who hath required this at your hand, to tread my courts?
(13) Bring no more vain oblations; incense is an abomination unto me; the new moons and sabbaths, the calling of assemblies, I cannot away with; it is iniquity, even the solemn meeting.
(14) Your new moons and your appointed feasts my soul hateth: they are a trouble unto me; I am weary to bear them.

The most immediate application of this passage is that it is the vain observance of the Lord's ordinances is displeasing to Him. It is curious that The Lord would do away with the Sabbaths (and other ordinances) as a response to Israel's disobedience.

Sixth Point: The Son of God Rose on the First Day.

It is a matter of common knowledge to Christians that the Son of God was crucified on a Friday, the sixth day, just before the Jewish Sabbath, and early on the morning of Sunday, the First day, Day One, He rose from the dead. (Matthew 28:1-6)

(1) In the end of the sabbath, as it is began to dawn toward the first day of the week, came Mary Magdalene and the other Mary to see the sepulchre.
(2) And, behold, there was a great earthquake: for the angel of the Lord descended from heaven, and came and rolled back the stone from the door, and sat upon it.
(3) His countenance was like lightning, and his raiment white as snow.
(4) And for fear of him the keepers did shake, and became as dead men.
(5) And the angel answered and said unto the women, Fear not ye: for I know that ye seek Jesus, which was crucified.
(6) He is not here: for His is risen, as He said, Come, see the place where The Lord lay.

Who lay in the sepulchre only to rise on Sunday morning, the third day after His crucifixion? The Lord did. Notice that detail that often gets overlooked, namely, that it was The Lord who rose on that day.

Just prior to The Savior's death the Apostle John recorded the Savior uttering the following words as He agonized on the cross: (John 19:30)

(30) When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished:
And he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost,

The significance of this utterance is seldom considered: "It is finished." When was the last time Deity had ever declared a work to be finished or ended? It was in reference to the works of creation which God had done in six days, during six creative "days" of work: "And on the seventh day God ended his works which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made." And notice the parallel: God ended His works of creation on the sixth day then "rested" during the entire seventh day. Consequently the seventh day became the Hebrew Sabbath, the day to remember that God rested on this day. Jesus, The Lord, finished His great work of the Atonement on Sixth Day, Friday by "giving up the ghost", "breathing out", then Jesus rested in Paradise during the entire Seventh Day. This demonstrates the great culmination of the Mosaic Sabbath. Finally Christ rose on the first day of the week thus breaking the bands of death on Sunday. It was thus on the first day of the week that the Sun of Righteousness rose with healing in His wings. (Malachi 4:2)

(2) But unto you that fear my name shall the Sun of Righteousness arise with healing in his wings; and ye shall go forth, and grow up as calves of the stall.

Jeremiah stated, though the affirmation is usually lost in translation, that the LORD gave the Sun for Light ['Or] of His Day. After Jesus's death on the cross and His rest in Paradise fulfilled the very object and aspirations of the Mosaic Law, Jesus rose as the Sun rises, in Resurrection.

The Mosaic Law, replete with animal sacrifices of unblemished male firstborns, all done for "atonement" of sins, saw its great climax when The Son of God was sacrificed for sin and laid to rest in a grave, to rest on the Seventh Day. The Savior's Resurrection was now the heralding of the New Covenant and Jeremiah prophesied would come with the Sun being given for Light of His, The Lord's, Day, as you will see shortly.

Notice that not only did The Lord rise from the dead on the First Day, it was on the First Day, Sunday, that He appeared to His Apostles, and that Sunday became the day of gathering for the Apostles: (John 20:1,19,26)

(1) The first day of the week cometh Mary Magdalene early, when it was yet dark, unto the sepulchre, and seeth the stone taken away from the sepulchre.
(19) Then the same day at evening, being the first day of the week, when the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled for fear of the Jews, came Jesus and stood in the midst, and saith unto them, Peace be unto you.
(26) And after eight days [in Middle Eastern reckoning "after 8 days", but in Western European reckoning "in seven days/one week later"] again his disciples were within, and Thomas with them: then came Jesus, the doors being shut, and stood in the midst, and said, Peace be unto you.

Thus the Resurrected Lord fulfilled the prophecy that the Son of God would rise from the dead as He, the Light of the world, arose. The Lord then made His first two appearances to His disciples in two separate gatherings that both took place on the first day of the week.

The pattern continued, that is, of gathering together on the First Day: (Acts 20:7)

(7) And upon the first day of the week, when the disciples came together to break bread, Paul preached unto them, ready to depart on the morrow; and continued his speech until midnight.

Notice that it was on the first day of the week that the disciples were meeting together to break bread. This practice, that of holding the sacrament on the first day of the week, is very significant. Why? Because the sacrament represents the sacrifice of the body and blood of the Son of God for the remission of sins  in the New Covenant: (Matthew 26:26-28)

(26) And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed it, and brake it, and gave it to the disciples, and said, Take, eat; this is my body.
(27) And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it;
(28) For this is my blood of the New Covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.

Now, the King James reads "this is my blood of the new testament", but the Greek source text reads, "this is my blood of the new covenant." This is fulfillment of the prophecy in Jeremiah that a new covenant would be instituted. Again, this development is significant because the Saturday Sabbath was instituted with the Law given to Moses; now that The Lord who declared Himself to be The Lord of the Sabbath (Matthew 12:8) instituted the New Covenant, a New Sabbath followed suit. Notice the parallels: The Lord gave the Mosaic Law after leading Israel out of bondage in Egypt. Now The Lord gave the New Covenant after delivering Israel and indeed the whole world from sin. It is important to remember that the law of the Sabbath has not been revoked, but the purpose of it, which had been to remember the completion of the Lord's work, advanced from the Creation alone to the great act of Redemption, in particular the Resurrection.

Seventh Point: A Lost New Testament Book and Historical Writings Confirm the Sunday Sabbath

The average Christian and layman, for that matter, is unaware that the oldest versions of The New Testament had additional books. The Codex Sinaiticus, created between AD 330-380 may very well be the oldest New Testament, and it had books after The Book of Revelation. Now, I say that the Codex Sinaiticus had "additional" books, mainly because these books were removed from subsequent copies of The New Testament, but I should rather write that our New Testaments lack the complete repertoire that had originally been there in the earliest Codices (Sinaiticus and Alexandrinus). My point in raising this issue is not to open a debate on the merits of the early decision to remove these books. I would, however, draw the reader's attention to The Epistle of Barnabas, believed to have been written by the Apostle Barnabas. He, Barnabas, treated the issue of the Sunday Sabbath with Apostolic authority: (Epistle of Barnabas 12:9-10)

(9) Lastly, he [referring to "The Lord"] saith unto them: Your new moons and your sabbaths I cannot bear them. Consider what he means by it; the sabbaths, says he, which ye now keep are not acceptable unto me, but those which I have made; when resting from all things I shall begin the eighth day, that is, the beginning of the other world.
(10) For which cause we observe the eighth day with gladness, in which Jesus rose from the dead; and having manifested himself to his disciples, ascended into heaven.

Here we have an Apostle of The Lord declaring that the "eighth" day was Sabbath of The Lord after His resurrection. Moreover, it is here, in this deleted New Testament epistle that an Apostle recorded The Lord declaring the "eighth day", (Sunday-1, Monday-2, Tuesday-3, Wednesday-4, Thursday-5, Friday-6, Saturday-7, Sunday-8) to be His Sabbath. I have on occasion heard people ask, "Where in The Bible does The Lord ever declare Sunday to be His Sabbath?" Well, in the original New Testament, The Lord made this bold declaration of the "eighth" day being His Sabbath, and an Apostle affirmed their Apostolic obedience to this decree. It should be noted that for the ancient Hebrews the number 8 denoted covenants, in particular the covenant of baptism. (1 Peter 3:20-21)

(20) Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of The God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, where few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.
(21) The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now doth save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ;
(22) Who is gone into heaven, and is on the right hand of The God; angels and authorities and powers being made subject unto him.

Notice that the figure of "eight" not only signified God's saving of the faithful few in Noah's Ark, but also our baptisms which symbolize the Resurrection. As pointed out in The Epistle of Barnabas, "eight" was the symbol of the Day of Resurrection.

But there is yet another record of early date, this time one that was never included in The New Testament canon, although many early Christians revered it as scripture. Ignatius, an early church father believed to have been a close associate of the Apostles, wrote an epistle to the Saints living in Magnesia. In chapter 3:1-3 Ignatius treated the issue of The Lord's Day:

(1) Be not deceived with strange doctrines; nor with old fables which are unprofitable. For if we still continue to live according to the Jewish law, we do confess ourselves not to have received grace. For even the most holy prophets lived according to Christ Jesus.
(2) And for this cause were they persecuted, being inspired by his grace, to convince the unbelievers and disobedient that there is one God who has manifested himself by Jesus Christ his son; who is his eternal word, not coming forth from silence, who in all things pleased him that sent him.
(3) Wherefore if they who were brought up in these ancient laws came nevertheless to the newness of hope: no longer observing sabbaths, but keeping the Lord's day in which also our life is sprung up by him, and through his death, whom yet some deny.

Now, lest anyone be too quick to discount the citations from The Epistle of Barnabas and The Epistle to the Magnesians, we may do well to take notice of a little known detail. In the Law of Moses The Lord commanded feast days as well. One of these feasts was The Feast of Tabernacles. This feast day was unique not only because it involved every family sitting in its own booth, oriented toward the Temple, but because this feast day had two Sabbath Days, one on the "first day" and another on the "eighth day" of the feasts: (Leviticus 23:39)

(39) Also in the fifteenth day of the seventh month, when ye have gathered in the fruit of the land, ye shall keep a feast unto the LORD seven days: on the first day shall be a sabbath, and on the eight day shall be a sabbath.

Thus there may be yet another precedent for a Sunday Sabbath inasmuch as the Two Sabbaths of the Feast of Tabernacles were on its first and eighth days which may have symbolic reference to the coming first/eighth day Sabbath of the New Covenant.

Eighth Point: The Book of Mormon Marks The Death of the Savior as the Point of Fulfillment of the Mosaic Law.

After the Savior pronounced the words "It is finished" and gave up the ghost, He went to Paradise, the abode of the righteous dead, just as He said He would (Luke 23:43):

(43) And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, Today shalt thou be with me in paradise.

It was from there, Paradise, that Jesus spoke to the more righteous Nephites, those who had been spared the prophesied destructions that would follow His death: (3 Nephi 9:15-19)

(15) Behold, I am Jesus Christ the Son of God. I created the heavens and the earth, and all things that in them are. I was with the Father from the beginning. I am in the Father, and the Father in me: and in me hath the Father glorified his name.
(16) I came unto my own, and my own received me not. And the scriptures concerning my coming are fulfilled.
(17) And as many as have received me, to them have I given to become the sons of God; and even so will I to as many as shall believe on my name, for behold, by me redemption cometh, and in me is the law of Moses fulfilled.
(18) I am the light and the life of the world. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end.
(19) And ye shall offer up unto me no more the shedding of blood; yea, your sacrifices and your burnt offerings shall be done away, for I will accept none of your sacrifices and your burnt offerings.

Notice how these two witnesses are so complimentary to each other? On the Cross, on Friday, The Lord, while suffering for the sins of the world stated, "It is finished", and then rested in Paradise. This act was the culmination of the Law of Moses. The Book of Mormon: Another Testament of Jesus Christ, restores another great teaching and confirmation of what we can deduce from The New Testament: The Death of Jesus not only marked the culmination of The Law of Moses, it marked the fulfillment of that Law.

As the Nephites (The Lord's covenant people among the ancient Amerindians) did not totally understand the expression that the Law of Moses was fulfilled, The Savior clarified this matter when, after His ascension into heaven, He visited the Nephites: (3 Nephi 15:4-9)

(4) Behold, I say unto you that the law is fulfilled that was given unto Moses.
(5) Behold, I am he that gave the law, and I am he who covenanted with my people Israel; therefore, the law in me is fulfilled, for I have come to fulfill the law; therefore it hath an end.
(6) Behold, I do not destroy the prophets, for as many as have not been fulfilled in me, verily I say unto you, shall all be fulfilled.
(7) And because I said unto you that old things have passed away, I do not destroy that which hath been spoken concerning things which are to come.
(8) for behold, the covenant which I have made with my people is not all fulfilled; but the law which was given unto Moses hath an end in me.
(9) Behold, I am the law, and the light. Look unto me, and endure to the end, and ye shall live; for unto him that endureth to the end will I give eternal life.

Thus we see clearly that The Lord Jesus Christ fulfilled the Law of Moses when He died on the cross and that He offered a new Law, a New Covenant, when He rose from the dead.

Ninth Point: The Sabbath Accepted by The Lord to Be a Day of Revelation.

The prophet Isaiah taught the great importance of the fast. This passage often receives much attention among the Latter-day Saints. But are we aware that Isaiah connected the fast to Sabbath-day observance? (Isaiah 58: 5-14) This point is critically important because to that people whose Sabbath Day is accepted of The Lord, He would reveal Himself, and that people would experience much restoration.

(5) Is it such a fast that I have chosen? a day for a man to afflict his soul? is it to bow down his head as a bulrush, and to spread sackcloth ashes under him? wilt thou call this a fast, and an acceptable day to The LORD?
(6) Is not this the fast that I have chosen? to loose the bands of wickedness, to undo the heavy burdens, and to let the oppressed go free, and that ye break every yoke?
(7) Is it not to deal thy bread to the hungry, and that thou bring the poor that are cast out to thy house? when thou seest the naked, that thou cover him: and that thou hide not thyself from thine own flesh?
(8) Then shall thy Light ['Or] break forth as the morning, and thine health shall spring forth speedily: and thy righteousness shall go before thee; the glory of the LORD shall be thy rereward.
(9) Then shalt thou call, and the LORD shall answer: thou shalt cry, and he shall say, Here I am. If thou take away from the didst of thee the yoke, the putting forth of the finger, and speaking vanity;
(10) And if thou draw out thy soul to the hungry, and satisfy the afflicted soul; then shall thy Light ['Or] rise in obscurity, and thy darkness be as the noonday.
(11) And the LORD shall guide thee continually, and satisfy thy soul in drought, and make fat thy bones: and thou shalt be like a watered garden, and like a spring of water, whose waters fail not.
(12) And they that shall be of thee shall build the old waste places: thou shalt raise up the foundations of many generations; and thou shalt be called, The repairer of the breach, The restorer of paths to dwell in.
(13) if thou turn away thy foot from the Sabbath, from doing thy pleasure on my holy day; and call the Sabbath a delight, the holy of the LORD, honorable: and shalt honour him, not doing thine own ways, nor finding thine own pleasure, nor speaking thine own words:
(14) Then shalt thou delight thyself in the LORD; and I will cause thee to ride upon the high places of the earth, and feed thee with the heritage of Jacob thy father: for the mouth of the LORD hath spoken it.

The Lord, speaking through the prophet Isaiah, promises great blessings of the personal revelation of The Lord, of hearing His voice and being led by Him in imagery not accidentally mirroring the way The Lord delivered Israel from Egypt. The Lord says that the Light, "'Or" shall dawn upon this people who fast as He proscribed. Then The Lord clarifies that this fast observance is linked to Sabbath-day observance. This day if acceptable to The Lord will be met with incredible restoration of what was had anciently and great soaring in the high places of the earth, which is doubtless a reference to the Temple.

Now, after the Resurrection of The Savior a new term for the day of worship arose, but the term was not without great precedent in the Law of Moses: The Lord's Day. We saw earlier how the apocryphal Epistle to the Magnesians, identified The Lord's Day as the first day of the week. There are numerous other ancient references to Sunday as The Lord's Day. Notice, though, that The New Testament book, The Book of Revelation, was received on The Lord's Day: (Revelation 1:10-11)

(10) I was in the Spirit on the Lord's day, and heard behind me a great voice, as of a trumpt,
(11) Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last: and, What thou seest, write in a book, and send it unto the seven churches which are in Asia; unto Ephesus, and unto Smyrna, and unto Pergamos, and unto Thyatira, and unto Sardis, and unto Philadelphia, and unto Laodicea.

Certainly the revelation that John received on The Lord's Day very much concurs with Isaiah's description of the blessings for fasting and sabbath day observance are.

Tenth Point: The Matter of Which Day, Saturday or Sunday, Was Resolved by The Lord via Modern Revelation.

But ultimately how will the matter of which day is The Lord's Sabbath, Saturday or Sunday, be resolved? I put it to the reader, not by studying the Word of God alone, but from hearing from Him. On 7 August, 1831, the prophet Joseph Smith received a revelation directly from The Lord. This became Section 59 of The Doctrine and Covenants of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Notice the language of The Lord and how amazingly it concurs with what He said anciently: (D&C 59: 3-4, 9-14)

(3) Yea, blessed are they whose feet stand upon the land of Zion, who have obeyed my gospel; for they shall receive for their reward the good things of the earth, and it shall bring forth in its strength.
(4) And they shall also be crowned with blessings from above, yea, and with commandments not a few, and with revelations in their time--they that are faithful and diligent before me.
(9) And that thou mayest more fully keep thyself unspotted from the world, thou shalt go to the house of prayer and offer up thy sacraments upon my holy day;
(10) For verily this day is a day appointed unto you to rest from your labors, and to pay thy devotions unto the Most High;
(11) Nevertheless, thy vows shall be offered up in righteousness on all days and at all times;
(12) But remember that on this, the Lord's day, thou shalt offer thine oblations and thy sacraments unto the Most High, confessing thy sins unto thy brethren, and before the Lord.
(13) And on this day thou shalt do none other thing, only let thy food be prepared with singleness of heart that thy fasting may be perfect, or in other words, that thy joy may be full.
(14) Verily, this is fasting and prayer, or in other words, rejoicing and prayer.

It is a matter of historical record that 7 August 1831 fell on a Sunday. Thus we have The Lord's own declaration that Sunday is The Lord's Day, His day of rest.

The reader is, obviously, at liberty to reach such conclusions as concur with their own reason and judgment. However, I ask only one thing: That the reader remember that what I have shared is actually textual.

Sunday, September 7, 2014

From Whence No Traveler Can Return

The Sumerian Goddess Ishtar in The Land of No Return

There are a list of topics I have tried to get to, and in each case someone has waited patiently. This is one, and so I will share what I have found.

It was back in July when an Elder asked me the following question:

Is it true that Lehi quotes Shakespeare?

The implication is important. Certainly the ramifications are clear enough to our brothers and sisters who see this verse as an obvious faux pas (misstep) on the part of Joseph Smith. Put simply, if Joseph Smith invented The Book of Mormon from his own imagination, and if while searching for things to say he used a line straight out of Shakespeare, then the citation would be “proof” Joseph Smith invented The Book of Mormon.

But in all fairness, let’s table the converse proposition, namely, If the passage in question is not a quote from Shakespeare but rather some aspect of the ancient world that was unknown at the time of the publication of The Book of Mormon, then we have yet another proof of the authenticity and genuineness of The Book of Mormon.

So let’s see what the issue is. I will quote the relevant passage from The Book of Mormon:

Awake! And arise from the dust,
and hear the words of a trembling parent,
whose limbs ye must soon lay down in the cold and silent grave
from whence no traveler can return;
a few more days and I go the way of all the earth.
(2 Nephi 1:14)

To grunt and sweat under a weary life,
But that the dread of something after death-
The undiscover'd country, from whose bourn
No traveller returns
- puzzles the will,
And makes us rather bear those ills we have
Than fly to others that we know not of?
(Hamlet, Act III, Scene 1, lines 1770-1775)

Now, let me introduce one other challenge. In 1826 a certain scholar by the name of Josiah Priest published a book entitled “The Wonders of Nature and Providence, Displayed”. Some detractors note that Josiah Priest quotes Shakespeare and actually misquotes Shakespeare, but the misquoted passage more closely resembles what Lehi said. The quote from Josiah Priest that is often cited is “from whence no traveller returns.” Herein is one piece of advice: Always check the source:

I then requested him to leave me,
as my time was short,
and I had some preparation to make
before I went hence to
that bourne from whence no traveller returns.”
(Josiah Priest, “The Wonders of Nature and Providence, Displayed”, 1826, p. 550)

The focus has long been on Lehi saying “from whence no traveller can return.” However, in Shakespeare, and indeed in all the quotes of this passage from Hamlet, the key words are “that bourne from whence no traveller can return.” (“Bourne” or “bourn” means “destination”.)

While we are on the point of quoting similar passages, let us examine two that often get overlooked:

Are not my days few?
cease then, and let me alone,
that I may take comfort a little.
Before I go whence I shall not return,
even to the land of darkness
and the shadow of death.
(Job 10:21-22)

When a few years are come,
then I shall go the way
whence I shall not return.
(Job 16:22)

What is particularly notable in the passages from Job is that not only do the words “whence” and “return” appear, but the expressions “(my) days few” and "go the way" appear. Notice how Lehi says “a few more days and I go the way (of all the earth)”. This is a pretty open and shut case: Lehi quoted Job. This is logical since Job was one of the most studied of ancient prophets precisely because he suffered so much during his life, and remained faithful. Job is quoted by other prophets, such as David who actually quotes with some modification the same passages Lehi did:

Behold, thou hast made my days
as an handbreadth;
and mine age is as nothing before thee:
verily every man at his best state
is altogether vanity. Selah.
O spare me,
that I may recover strength,
before I go hence,
and be no more.
(Psalm 39:5,13)                                                                        

In this passage David makes reference to having few days left, “days as an handbreadth” and going hence to “be no more”, i.e. “shall not return”.

There is, however, a little more to share. The peoples of the ancient Middle East had curious descriptive names for the afterworld.

Among the Sumerians, from 911-612 BC, on clay tablets the following term is attested, “Kurnugia” or ‘the Land of No Return’. http://cdli.ox.ac.uk/wiki/doku.php?id=descent_ishtar_netherworld
In the Sumerian poem dated to 911-612 BC, the Goddess Ishtar, having decided to descend from Heaven to Earth, now decides to descend from Earth to the Underworld of the dead. Note the following passage, the introductory stanza “The Descent of Ishtar to the Underworld”:

To Kurnugi, (‘To the Land of No Return’),
Ishtar daughter of Sin was [determined] to go;
The daughter of Sin was determined to go
To the dark house, dwelling of Erkalla's god,
To the house which those who enter cannot leave,
On the road where travelling is one-way only,
To the house where those who enter are deprived of light,
Where dust is their food, clay their bread.
They see no light, they dwell in darkness,
They are clothed like birds, with feathers.
Over the door and the bolt, dust has settled.
Addressed her words to the keeper of the gate, 
"Here gatekeeper, open your gate for me, 
Open your gate for me to come in! 

Notice the Sumerians also used the imagery of “dwelling in darkness” and “no light” as Job did, and travelers are on a “one-way road” to “the Land of No Return”.

There are more texts from the period just prior to Lehi's putative departure from Jerusalem, texts that are dedicated to the God Tammuz (or Dumuzi/d). In the lament “In the Desert by the Early Grass” the realm of the dead is referred to both as “The Far-off Land” and “The Land of No Return”. Here is an excerpt of a mother offering to travel with her son (who has died) to the underworld:

If it be required, thou lad,
let me walk with thee
the road of no return.
She goes, she goes
toward the breast of the mountains,
the day waning, the day waning,
toward the mountains, still bright,
to him who lies in blood and water,
the sleeping lord,
to him who knows no healing lustrations,
to the road making an end
of the one who walks it,
to the traces of the kings,
to the grange of the anointed ones.


What is very interesting about the passage from the text describing the God Tammuz is that is "the road of no return" and the reference to "day waning", i.e., not much time or many days left until the end. However, even more relevant is that fact that some Israelites adopted the worship of Tammuz at the time that Lehi was in Jerusalem, as seen in The Book of Ezekiel in The Bible:

Then he brought me to the door
of the gate of the LORD’s house
which was toward the north;
and, behold, there sat women
weeping for Tammuz.
(Ezekiel 8:14)

It is noteworthy that Ezekiel was born in 622 B.C. and died in 570 B.C. He was a contemporary of Lehi, and hence Ezekiel’s prophecy of the sticks of Judah and Joseph are quoted in The Book of Mormon: Another Testament of Jesus Christ, 2 Nephi 3:12.

Thus not only does Lehi’s passage on death bear strong influence from Job, Lehi’s passage reveals common expressions used in the Middle East, and not just in that region, in that region just prior to 600 B.C., (“The Descent of Ishtar to the Underworld” and “In the Desert by the Early Grass”).

Textual detective work is fun, to say the least. As to the implications of the passages I will leave readers to ponder the significance independently. However the reader feels inclined to lean, though, I would ask one thing only: that we remember that the citations are “actually textual”.

Nota Bene: I owe a debt of gratitude to Leah Whitehead Craig whose well researched thesis proved invaluable in referencing Sumerian texts from the region of Palestine in the decades just prior to Lehi’s departure from Jerusalem. (http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1116&context=stu_hon_theses

Sunday, July 13, 2014

How One Word Can Make All The Difference



I have a tendency to become verbose when I write, but I can be more concise when I speak. Here I will attempt to be succinct.

Latter-day Saints (Mormons) believe that a man and woman should get married in an LDS Temple, not till death do them part, but "for all time and all eternity". We LDS often use a simple phase to convey this idea: "Families can be together forever."

However, sharing this particular belief with our fellow Christians often invites the following question:
Where in The Bible does it say that people are commanded to get married (sealed) in temples for all time and all eternity?
Well, surprise-surprise, there is no explicit statement in the form of "Thou shalt marry in the temple for all eternity" in The Bible or in any other LDS book of scripture. To be sure, the doctrine is clear in a revelation given to Joseph Smith:
... All covenants, contracts, bonds, obligations, oaths, vows, performances, connections, associations, or expectations, that are not made and entered into and sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise...are of no efficacy, virtue, or force in and after the resurrection from the dead; for all contracts that are not made unto this end have an end when men are dead. (Doctrine and Covenants, Section 132:7)
And again, verily I say unto you, if a man marry a wife, by my word, which is my law, and by the new and everlasting covenant, and it is sealed unto them by the Holy Spirit of promise... [it] shall be in full force when they are out of the world...(Doctrine and Covenants, Section 132:19)
But is it true that the doctrine of "eternal families" and "temple marriage" is not in The Bible?

Let's look at what The Bible says about marriage. As it turns out, there is a single Biblical commandment on marriage, and it is found in Genesis, chapter 2:24:
Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.
As it turns out, the full application of this verse hinges on a single word, "therefore". In English "therefore" means 'for that reason, consequently'. However, the Hebrew phrase that is translated "therefore" is "'al kehn", literally 'on(to) like-that'. This conjunction can be understood well enough as "therefore", in the sense of 'consequently' and "wherefore" 'as a result of which', but also "like so" or "like that".

So is the only Biblical command to marry (not counting marriages under very specific and unseemly circumstances per the Law of Moses) stating that mankind should marry simply as a consequence of Adam and Eve's marriage, or is the passage in question, Genesis 2:24, stating that "like so" or "like that" should mankind marry?

If we consider the valid translation of "like so" or "like that", either of which conveys the sense of 'that is how', let us consider the marriage of Adam and Eve.

  1. Genesis 2:8   The Lord God places Adam in the Garden of Eden.
  2. Genesis 2:19  When the Lord God declares that "it is not good that the man should be alone", the Lord God brings animals to Adam and tests him on their names. Adam passes, which is perhaps a demonstration of his readiness to assume stewardship.
  3. Genesis 2:22  The Lord God, having formed Eve, brings her to Adam in the Garden of Eden.
  4. Genesis 2:24  In the Garden of Eden the declaration is made: "Like that shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh."
The Garden of Eden was the first temple, and all subsequent temples were symbolic of it. Consider the following comparison of the Garden of Eden to the Hebrew Tabernacle and Temple (per http://www.spiritandtruth.org/teaching/Book_of_Revelation/commentary/htm/04160501.htm):
  1. Garden of Eden and Tabernacle both have doors that open to the East. 
  2. Cherubim guarded (restricted not prohibited) entry into the Garden of Eden, and veils with representations of Cherubim marked the entry to the Tabernacle.
  3. Cherubim had a "flaming sword" and in the Tabernacle an altar with a fire on it was found after the veil.
  4. A river flowed from Eden (presumably for washing), and the Temple had a bronze laver filled with water, for washing.
  5. Since the river flowed from Eden it may be presumed that Eden was elevated, and the Temple is referred to as "the mountain of the Lord's House". The Temple in Jerusalem was on a mount.
  6. The Tree of Life stood in the center of Eden, and in the Holy of Holies the Testimony of the Law of Moses, their "life" (Deuteronomy 32:46-47) was stored in the Ark of the Covenant.
Also consider the following facts:
  1. When the Lord God married Adam and Eve there was no death in the world, so presumably their marriage, performed in the Garden of Eden, by God, by His authority, was indefinite or eternal.
  2. After both Adam and Eve transgressed and both sin and death entered into the world, at no time did God rescind their marriage or impose a "till death do you part" clause as a consequence of the Fall. 
  3. Instead God let stand the original statement, "Like that shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh."
So it is true, there is no Biblical commandment in the form of "Thou shalt marry in the Temple for all time and all eternity", but the only marriage proscribed by God for all His children is (a) between a man and a woman, (b) in the Temple, (c) by His authority, and (d) for all time and eternity.

One note: Just as in their mortal life not all have the opportunity to hear the message of the Restored Gospel, not all have the opportunity to marry. Some people pass away young, others have physical and/or mental impediments, some for a variety of reasons are not ready for or able to undertake the responsibility. One group of our brethren are homosexual and, facing the grave and stark decision to pursue family and love outside of God's proscriptions or celibacy inside God's proscriptions, choose the latter. Especially among our brethren who came of age before both the Church and society understood homosexuality better, these our brethren find themselves married, but unable to continue the pretense of heterosexuality. My heart goes out to my fellow Gays in and out of the Church, and I will make every effort to apply the balm of God's mercy, as He has done, for all, for to acknowledge their challenges is to shoulder their burden. Brotherhood does not mean that we have an answer for every challenge, but by standing shoulder to shoulder with our brethren, even burdens we cannot comprehend seem lighter to them. Especially in this day and age (we are all aware of the issues), when my brethren take a moment to ask how I feel, simply because circumstances can create in me the sense of marginalization, I feel included, not alienated. Gosh darn it, caring concern from another strengthens me. I just wanted to share this last note in the hope that we always remember that "All are alike unto God", and that Jesus came to gather all people to Him. The Lord hasten that great day.

Sunday, June 8, 2014

Crying Out in the Name of YHWH


Faith is a belief that motivates me to take action because I am hopeful and confident that I can achieve the result. I receive confirmations that my faith or motivated belief is true based on the results, those being chiefly (1) how the guidance I am adopting leads me to evolve into a more virtuous person, (2) how I experience greater peace, love, and kindness by adhering to the principles I am ultimately testing via practice, and (3) how this motivated belief actually brings me into real interactions, responses, knowledge of God.

I have faith in The Bible as the Word of God. I have faith in The Book of Mormon: Another Testament of Jesus Christ. Often, quite often, my fellow Christians and well as my beloved brethren of Islam, Judaism, Buddhism, Hinduism and Atheism ask me for "proofs", a witness via archaeology and geology, evidence that the scientific community itself would rally behind...and then my brethren state that they would be more willing to believe. 

But I ask, "Then my brethren would be more willing to believe what?" I have my proof, they are the three things I noted above--increasing virtue, greater peace, love and kindness, and real and personal knowledge of God. This is the experiment that most matters to me, and I put it forward, that ought to matter to all people. I cannot wear or feel archaeology or geology, much as I do esteem them and all disciplines of science and learning, but I can live and enrich my life as I outlined above (virtue, peace/love/kindness, and the personal knowledge of God) and know the goodness of this impact on me. 

I read the following in The Book of Mormon: Another Testament of Jesus Christ (2 Nephi 9:52-53):
Behold, my beloved brethren, remember the words of your God; pray unto him continually by day, and give thanks unto his holy name by night. Let your hearts rejoice.
And behold how great the covenants of the Lord, and how great his condescensions unto the children of men; and because of his greatness, and his grace and mercy, he has promised unto us that our seed shall not utterly be destroyed, according to the flesh, but that he would preserve them; and in future generations they shall become a righteous branch unto the house of Israel.

This is from Nephi Ben Lehi, the putative second prophet of The Book of Mormon, circa 559 B.C. His points can be organized into a list.

  1. Remember the words of our God.
  2. Pray unto Him by day.
  3. Give thanks unto His holy name by night.
  4. Rejoice in one's heart.
  5. Consider the great covenants of the Lord.
  6. Consider His condescensions (visits, voluntary descents to earth) unto the children of men (humanity).
  7. Because of His greatness, grace and mercy God promises the ultimate preservation of our descendants even if these fall away during some subsequent time.  
  8. These shall be a righteous "branch" of the House of Israel.
These points are interesting. I would like to start a closer scrutiny of these eight points starting with God's condescensions because I have found that if this matter is considered, the other points fall into a pattern that has its foundation in nothing less than the Law of Moses itself.

In Exodus 19:18 Jehovah is described as descending upon Mount Sinai in fire. In Exodus 20:1-3, God, "Elohim", speaks to Moses in direct speech (referring to Himself as "I" and Moses, His addressee, as "thou"):

And God [Elohim] spake all these words, saying, 
I am the LORD thy God [Jehovah thy Elohim], which [I] have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
Thou shalt have no other gods before Me.
Most Christians and Jews, and I would suspect a good number of my beloved Muslim brethren, are familiar with this encounter. God descended to the earth and addressed Moses on Mount Sinai. God identified Himself as Jehovah thy God and commanded that no other god [in Hebrew "Elohim" or 'Gods'] be had before Him.

The encounter of Exodus 20 is the delivery of the Ten Commandments, the first version at least, in the Torah, (another version does follow). Less commonly studied are the subsequent descents or "condescensions" of God. For this I will cite first Exodus 33:19:
And he [Jehovah] said, I will make all my goodness pass before thee, and I will proclaim the name of the LORD before thee; and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will shew mercy on whom I will shew mercy.
In this exchange Jehovah tells Moses that He, Jehovah, will "proclaim" the name of Jehovah. However, that is not what the Hebrew text says. The Hebrew text is clear and declarative; it is in the translation that the message is modified somewhat. This is a more careful rendering from Hebrew:
And He said, I will make all my goodness pass before thee, and I will cry out in the name of Jehovah before thee; and I will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and I will shew mercy on whom I will shew mercy.
Now, this reading gives pause. Jehovah said that He is going to "cry out in the name of Jehovah". What does that mean? Well, I put it to my readers that this expression "cry out in the name of Jehovah" means in Exodus 33:19 precisely what it always meant before this, "to turn to Jehovah, to pray to Him." Preaching could be subsumed in this, but the emphasis is on the actual addressing of Jehovah by one of His sons or daughters, and addressing by name. I refer the reader to the first usage of this expression in our received texts, which is in Genesis 4:26:
And to Seth, to him also there was born a son; and he called his name Enos: then began men to call upon the name of the LORD.
Here, however, the King James translators handed us their interpretation when the actual reading was clear enough:
And to Seth, to him also there was born a son; and he [Seth] called his name Enos [meaning 'man, human, mortal man']: then began he [Enos] to cry out in the name of Jehovah
So what did it mean that Enos, and by extension a good many other people who, at the teachings of the early patriarchs and matriarchs, decided to follow God? It meant that these turned to God, prayed to Him, served Him; in short, they "cried out in the name of Jehovah".

Alright, but then what does it mean that even Jehovah "cried out in the name of Jehovah"? Well, welcome to the real Bible text: There are Two Jehovahs in The Bible! One was the Father and the other His Son. Jehovah the Father is, in the more familiar and familial New Testament form of address, "God the Father" or "Heavenly Father", whereas the second Jehovah, His Son, is antemortal Jesus Christ, the Savior and Redeemer of the world. Inasmuch as the Son was and is an Angel to His Father (Exodus 32:34 "behold, mine Angel shall go before thee"), delivering and performing only the will of the Father, there was ultimately little difference in distinguishing Who exactly was speaking at any given time.

However, we do remember that God spoke in the "first" person in Exodus 20, "I am Jehovah thy God". The reader is counseled to remember that Hebrew (like Aramaic and Arabic) has never had capital letters nor "be" in the present tense. The King James translators italicized words that they added to the English translation to make the English read more grammatically correct. Hence the King James translators italicized "am", because the Hebrew actually says "I Jehovah thy God" (no forms of "be" in the present tense).

Let us briefly examine what the Lord says and does when He follows through with His promise to Moses, the promise to "cry out in the name of Jehovah" in front of Moses. Exodus 34:5:
And the LORD descended in the cloud, and stood with him there, and proclaimed the name of the LORD.
As you may have anticipated, I will offer the reader a more precise rendering of the Hebrew, one without obfuscation to cover for a situation the translators could not fathom, namely, why and how Jehovah would be seen praying to Jehovah.
And Jehovah descended in the cloud, and stood with him there, and cried out in the name of Jehovah.
The message Jehovah delivers is in Exodus 34:6-7.
And the LORD passed by before him, and proclaimed, The LORD, The LORD God, merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth,
Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear the guilty; visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, and upon the children's children, unto the third and to the fourth generation.
Here, again, a more careful translation is warranted.

And Jehovah passed by before him [Moses], and proclaimed, Jehovah, Jehovah Elohim is merciful and gracious, long-suffering, and abundant in goodness and truth,
Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means excuse; visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, and upon the children's children, unto the third and to the fourth. 
Please note: My decision to insert "is" is not fortuitous nor biased, since the subsequent verbal form of "will by no means excuse/cover" is in the third person.

So not only did Jehovah cry out (i.e. "pray") in the name of Jehovah, Jehovah also proclaimed Jehovah to be (now using the third person form of address) "merciful, long-suffering, abundant in goodness and truth, keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity, transgression and sin, not excusing (literally "covering"), and eventual mercy for the descendants of the rebellious. We might make a list:

  1. Jehovah cries out in the name of Jehovah (vocal prayer).
  2. Jehovah proclaims Jehovah's mercy, 
  3. grace, 
  4. long-suffering (great patience), 
  5. abundance of goodness and truth, 
  6. mercy for thousands, 
  7. forgiveness for iniquity-transgression-sin, 
  8. not excusing (i.e. respecting agency or ability for us to choose by holding us responsible),
  9. eventual mercy for descendants of the rebellious. 
I would draw attention to the list I compiled of the main points from 2 Nephi 9:52-53. The similarities are not so close as to trigger suspicion of plagiarism or borrowing, but the structural similarities are astonishing: prayer precedes the extolling of God's virtues, the principal virtues being mercy and grace, but emphasis also falls on the responsibility for our behavior, but even here, God's ultimate mercy to the descendants of the rebellious. 

I will add one comment: Such an uncanny parallel between the Biblical Hebrew text and The Book of Mormon, not the King James translation that Joseph Smith was so fond of in life, but the underlying Hebrew of The Bible, which Hebrew text Joseph Smith only began to appreciate in the years after he published The Book of Mormon, this is "textual archaeology" and to some extent (loci, locations) "geology" for me, that is textual evidence in Palestine and America, and the text is ultimately what we have in hand to scrutinize. 

Still, correspondences of this sort only encourage my faith; it is the three points I outlined earlier (growth in virtue, increase in peace-love-kindness, and greater personal knowledge of God) that have led me and lead me still to know that The Book of Mormon is actually true, it is the Word of God alongside The Holy Bible.

The reader is at great liberty to take any portion of what I have presented, including zero, as seems fit. However, I would ask that all remember one point mainly: that all citations are actually textual.

Sunday, May 25, 2014

Two Related But Unalike: Do Mormons Really Believe that Jesus and Satan are Brothers?


A dear missionary I met and with whom I had the pleasure of working on a couple of occasions called me. He had been out, bearing the heat, the disciplines and rigors of missionary life to share the message of Jesus Christ restoring all that He had once sent to bless this world: Ordinances performed by divine authority (Priesthood), The Gift of the Holy Ghost, modern revelations (both personal, family, and Church-wide), living prophets and apostles, scriptures both revealed now though from the past and revealed freshly in our day joined to the received tome, The Holy Bible, in short, God's abiding love for all mankind.

The Elder encountered a man, a man who doubtlessly loves God and reveres the Word of God, but who had a concern that seemed like so blatant a doctrinal absurdity as to invalidate all the Elders stood there to offer: That according to Mormon doctrine, Jesus Christ and Satan are brothers.

The Elder asked me if I could respond to this. So here is my response. These words are chosen carefully: Here is "my" response.
  1. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has no scripture that overtly states "Jesus Christ and Satan are brothers."
  2. That said, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has four books of scripture (in order of publication): The Holy Bible (King James Version), The Book of Mormon: Another Testament of Jesus Christ, The Doctrine and Covenants, The Pearl of Great Price. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints holds to the faith that as time goes on, more books of scripture will be revealed, so many that the revelation would be deemed a flood of the knowledge of God that will fill the earth.
  3. In the scriptures there are sufficient teachings to establish that all beings, embodied, unembodied, disembodied, are children of the same God, our Heavenly Father, and are thus brothers and sisters. So yes, not only are Jesus and Satan brothers, but we all who now live, ever have lived, and ever will live, are brothers and sisters of Jesus Christ, as well as the Adversary, Satan, and his hosts.
All Spirits Are Children of God

The Psalmist, David, penned perhaps the most beautiful declaration of the divine nature of all humanity in Psalm 82:1,6:
1: God standeth in the congregation of the mighty; he judgeth among the gods.
6: I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.
This declaration, however bold, is somewhat muted in translation. I offer a more careful rendering of the Hebrew:

1: God [Elohim] standeth in the Church of God [El]; He judgeth among the Gods [Elohim].
6: I have said, Ye are Gods [Elohim]; and all of you are children of the Most High.
God, "Elohim", standeth in a Church, His Church, the Church of God, presumably a congregation in Heaven. And He, God, judges among Gods. What Gods? The angels. How would angels be Gods? They are His children. But the Palmist does not stop there. He goes on to affirm what else God Himself declares: "Ye are Gods, and all of you are children of the Most High." We humans are, likewise, Gods, children of the Most High.

The prophet Malachi recorded God addressing Himself as "Father" (Malachi 1:6)
6: A son honoureth his father, and a servant his master: if then I be a father, where is mine honour? and if I be a master, where is my fear? saith the LORD of hosts unto you, O priests, that despise my name. And ye say, Wherein have we despised thy name?
If that citation was not direct enough, Malachi poses a question that today may be viewed as a doctrinal declaration, though in its context this was an appeal to a belief already widely held (Malachi 2:10):
10: Have we not all one father? hath not one God created us? why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother, by profaning the covenants of our fathers?
Jesus further clarified this doctrinal point by declaring that of all the titles God could choose for us to use to address Him, He chose "Father" (Matthew 6:9)
9: After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name.
As we saw in Psalm 82, God chooses to call not only angels but us humans His children and indeed Gods, children of God. This very point is in Psalm 8:4-5:
4: What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man that thou visitest him? 
5: For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels, and hast crowned him with glory and honour. 
I would point out that the translators opted to write "a little lower than the angels", though the Hebrew clearly states "For thou hast made him a little lower than Gods, and hast crowned him with glory and honour."

The New Testament Apostle Paul referred to God as the "Father of our spirits" (Hebrews 12:9):
9: Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which corrected us, and we gave them reverence: shall we not much rather be in subjection unto the Father of spirits, and live? 
These verses are sufficient to demonstrate that both angels in heaven and human beings are the children of God, for God is the Father of spirits.

The Relationship Between Angels and Mankind

To be direct, all people lived before we were born in this earth; we lived with God the Father.
(Alma 29:17) And now may God grant unto these, my brethren, that they may sit down in the kingdom of God; yea, and also all those who are the fruit of their labors that they may go no more out, but that they may praise him forever. And may God grant that it may be done according to my words, even as I have spoken. Amen.
(Ecclesiastes 12:7) Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it.
(Numbers 16:22) And they fell upon their faces, and said, O God, the God of the spirits of all flesh, shall one man sin, and wilt thou be wroth with all the congregation? 
(Zechariah 12:1) The burden of the word of the LORD for Israel, saith the LORD, which stretcheth forth the heavens, and layeth the foundations of the earth, and formeth the spirit of man within him.
These citations are fairly indicative of the antemortal character of man's spirit. Zechariah 12:1 is of particular importance. First of all, a more careful rendering of the Hebrew would be useful:
1: The burden of the word of the LORD for Israel, saith the LORD, the Stretcher-forth of the heavens, the Layer of the foundations of the earth, and the Former of the spirit of man within him.
This citation is noteworthy. When did the Lord stretch forth the heavens and lay the foundation of the earth? And for that matter, when did the Lord form the spirits of men, the very spirits Zechariah was told are within man? The answer is Genesis 2:1-5:
1: Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.
2: And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made.
3: And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made.
4: These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens,
5: And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground. 
Four very relevant points are to be discerned in this passage.

  1. That God had finished the heavens, the earth, and their host prior to the seventh day. 
  2. The plants and herbs were made before they actually grew in the earth (spirit creation preceded physical/tangible creation).
  3. That physical man (the Hebrew word used for "man" in verse 5 is "Adam") had not yet been made for the purpose of tilling the earth.
  4. Anything God sanctifies He has first made, and then the "sanctification" is declared or performed on it. "On the seventh day God ended his work...rested on the seventh day...and sanctified it." The full significance of this principle will be demonstrated shortly.
The oft overlooked teaching held in this citation is that Moses had recorded that the heavens, the earth, and their host were created prior to the seventh day, the day when God rested. It is worth noting that the Hebrew term "tzava" translated as 'host' most often means '(military) division', and it is a military term denoting an organized gathering of soldiers.

So I ask the question: If God finished His labors of creation on the seventh day, and He has angels in Heaven, when did He, God, create these angels? Answer: Since God does not mention creating them (or the Heavens where God dwells, for that matter) during the six creative periods, and on the seventh He rested, the only conclusion I can draw is that God created the spirits that He later calls His sons/children, "Gods", prior to the physical creation of this earth in the six creative periods.

Now, earlier I stated that there is significance in God's sanctifying the seventh day after He rested from all His labors on the seventh day. The principle at play here is demonstrated time and time again in the scriptures. Put succinctly: First an entity is formed/shaped/fashioned/created, then it is sanctified. God does not sanctify something before bringing that entity into being. Bearing that in mind, look at Jeremiah 1:5 for what the Lord told that great Old Testament prophet:
5: Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations.
So, God reveals that He knew Jeremiah before He, God, had formed him in the belly. God also sanctified Jeremiah before he was born. I am reminded of what was recorded in Deuteronomy 34:10 about how God knew Moses:
10: And there arose not a prophet since in Israel like unto Moses, whom the LORD knew face to face.
God knows us intimately, and if He declares that He knew us, it was personal, face to face. One final point on the matter: It is a simple issue of syntax (how words are combined to convey an idea) that if the message of Jeremiah 1:5 were simply an example of God's foreknowledge, it would read "Before I formed thee in the belly I knew of thee", which the text does not. God is declaring not foreknowledge (of which He has full foreknowledge), but real, experience-based knowledge, presumably of the face-to-face type.

Some Spirit Children of God Rose to the Forefront: Morning Stars and the Sons of God

In one of God's many addresses to Job, the ancient prophet and exemplar of steadfastness in the face of excruciating suffering and setbacks, God posed this question to the suffering Job, a series of questions meant to reaffirm Job's worth, his role, his divine character (Job 38:4-7):
4: Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding.
5: Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it?
6:  Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof;
7: When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy? 
Notice how God mentions a broad category and a specific instance or example of that category: "measures: line", "foundations : corner stone". Then he mentions that "morning stars : all the sons of God" are one and the same, though the implication of "morning stars" is that they were a subcategory of God's children, presumably the first to appear, most likely the first to rise to the forefront. Nevertheless, the ultimate honor is be called a "son/daughter of God".

Jesus refers to Himself as "the bright and morning star" in Revelation, 22:16:
16: I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.
So there were several "morning stars" among the "sons of God", but "the bright and morning star" was Jesus Christ.

One Morning Star Fell From Grace

Under inspiration the prophet Isaiah had referred to Lucifer himself as a "son of morning", but one that fell (Isaiah 14:12):
12:  How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!
It is worth noting that the King James translators exercised a little poetic license in this passage. A more careful reading from the Hebrew follows:
12: How thou didst fall from heaven, O Morning Star, son of the dawn. Thou wast cast down to earth, one laying low to the nations!
Here we see that the fallen angel was indeed a "morning star".

The prophet Lehi, upon reading the above-cited passage from Isaiah, drew the following conclusion (2 Nephi 2:17-18, The Book of Mormon: Another Testament of Jesus Christ):

 17: And I, Lehi, according to the things which I have read, must needs suppose that an angel of God, according to that which is written, had fallen from heaven; wherefore, he became a devil, having sought that which was evil before God.
18: And because he had fallen from heaven, and had become miserable forever, he sought also the misery of all mankind. Wherefore, he said unto Eve, yea, even that old serpent, who is the devil, who is the father of all lies, wherefore he said: Partake of the forbidden fruit, and ye shall not die, but ye shall be as God, knowing good and evil.
The prophet Jacob, son of Lehi, also emphasized the fall of the angel, (2 Nephi 9:8,9):
8: O the wisdom of God, his mercy and grace! For behold, if the flesh should rise no more our spirits must become subject to that angel who fell from before the presence of the Eternal God, and became the devil, to rise no more.
9: And our spirits must have become like unto him, and we become devils, angels to a devil, to be shut out from the presence of our God, and to remain with the father of lies, in misery, like unto himself; yea, to that being who beguiled our first parents, who transformeth himself nigh unto an angel of light, and stirreth up the children of men unto secret combinations of murder and all manner of secret works of darkness.
Thus we see that two ancient prophets, Lehi and Jacob Ben Lehi, concluded and affirmed that an angel had fallen from the presence of God, and it was that fallen angel who tempted the primordial parents, Adam and Eve, and who continues an adversarial role in the lives of all humanity. Thus the fall of a "morning star", called "Lucifer" in the Latin (Catholic) tradition and translation, preceded the six creative periods by the process of relative chronology: If Lucifer tempted Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden, and no mention of his creation as a morning star is made in the six creative periods, then the creation of the sons of God including the vanguard of "morning stars" as well as the fall of a morning star preceded the creation periods.

How Satan Fell: Gross Pride

In the Pearl of Great Price God revealed to the Prophet Moses how it was that Satan came to be the devil (Moses 4:1-4)
1: And I, the Lord God, spake unto Moses, saying: That Satan, whom thou hast commanded in the name of mine Only Begotten, is the same which was from the beginning, and he came before me, saying--Behold, here am I, send me, I will be thy son, and I will redeem all mankind, that one soul shall not be lost, and surely I will do it; wherefore give me thine honor.
 2: But, behold, my Beloved Son, which was my Beloved and Chosen from the beginning, said unto me--Father, thy will be done, and the glory be thine forever.
3: Wherefore, because that Satan rebelled against me, and sought to destroy the agency of man, which I, the Lord God, had given him, and also, that I should give unto him mine own power; by the power of mine Only Begotten, I caused that he should be cast down;
4: And he became Satan, yea, even the devil, the father of all lies, to deceive and to blind men, and to lead them captive at his will, even as many as would not hearken unto my voice. 
Satan offered God an alternative plan for the salvation of God's children, and for this plan, Satan required (or attempted to do so) that he be given the honor of being chosen as the Redeemer.

God revealed to the Apostle John that there had been war in heaven, and that it consisted of Satan and the angels that followed him contending against the other angels. Consequently, Satan and his followers were cast out of heaven (Revelation 12:7-9):
7: And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,
8: And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.
9: And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
John describes Satan's followers as "a third" of the "stars of heaven" (Revelation 12:4)
4: And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born.
 God Grieved Over the Loss of His Children

In vision the Prophet Joseph Smith saw the fall of Satan and many others of God's spirit children who chose to follow Satan. However, in this vision Joseph Smith fills in an important detail (Doctrine and Covenants 76:25-29)
25: And this we saw also, and bear record, that an angel of God who was in authority in the presence of God, who rebelled against the Only Begotten Son whom the Father loved and who was in the bosom of the Father, was thrust down from the presence of God and the Son,
26: And was called Perdition, for the heavens wept over him--he was Lucifer, a son of the morning.
27: And we beheld, and lo, he is fallen! is fallen, even a son of the morning!
28: And while we were yet in the Spirit, the Lord commanded us that we should write the vision; for we beheld Satan, that old serpent, even the devil, who rebelled against God, and sought to take the kingdom of our God and Christ--
29: Wherefore, he maketh war with the saints of God, and encompasseth them round about.
This brilliant vision affirms the conclusions and revelations from the past, but one critical detail is included: that the heavens, God and His other children, wept over the loss of these fallen spirit children of God. God loved and still loves His fallen children, but He being holy cannot allow the unholy to dwell in His presence.

Summary: We Are All (All Humans and Spirits, Good and Bad) Children of God, Brothers and Sisters

So we have seen that God created all the spirits of mankind before the six creative periods, how one morning star contended against God's will and fell, but not before persuading one third of his brethren and sisters to follow him to misery. We saw how the scriptures teach that both the angels in heaven who await birth (including the fallen angels who will never have the opportunity to be born and receive bodies with the divine destiny to return to God's presence never more to depart) and those who have been born in this life are the sons/children of God, and God calls them Gods. Thus there is no impropriety in stating that Jesus and Lucifer are siblings any more than there is in stating that we are all brothers and sisters, you, James (moi), the Dalai Lama, Adolf Hitler, Mother Theresa, Joseph Smith, Joseph Stalin, Mary the Mother of Jesus, etc. We all have One Father, He loves us all, and He prepared the way for all of His children who chose to follow His will while still in Heaven and who will renew that commitment at this stage of life (and many who will do so after passing on to the realm of the spirits of the deceased), which can be summed up in following way: Jesus is the way, the truth and the life; no man cometh unto the Father but by Him.

Happy Sabbath and blessed week to all!

Sunday, May 18, 2014

Our Lord, Come!



I love languages. I love linguistics. More than that, though, I love how language is the mode for conveying meaning. Take for instance a not-too-often quoted expression used by the apostle Paul. In the ante-penultimate verse of 1 Corinthians 16, Paul wrote the following:

If any man love not the Lord Jesus Christ,
let him be Anathema
"Maran-Atha".

This expression "Maran-Atha" is from Palestinian Aramaic, the language Jesus, his apostles and indeed most first century Jews spoke. The expression is often translated as 'Come, O Lord'. Time and again I find that when translations are offered precision is preferable to flow. The word "Maran" is to be parsed "Mar" 'Lord' "-an" 'our' and "Atha" 'come': "Our Lord, Come!"  

In ancient Hebrew the Israelites had the practice of referring to Deity by various forms of the word "God" (a topic for another day) and YHWH 'Jehovah' or "Adonai" 'Lord'. About three centuries before the birth of Christ Alexandrian Jews translated many Hebrew holy books to Greek. These translators opted to render both YHWH and Adonai identically, "Kyrios" 'Lord'. 

When the Aramaic-speaking Jews, however, translated their scriptures from Hebrew to Aramaic, the translators preserved the distinction between YHWH and Adonai through an ingenious device. The Aramaic-speaking translators took their word "Mar" 'Lord' and affixed "Yah" to it, "MarYah" 'Lord Jehovah', as the translation for YHWH 'Jehovah.' The title "Yah" (alternative spelling is "Jah", though the pronunciation should still be [Yah]) is the short-form of the name Jehovah. In English we say "Jehovah", though the Ancient Hebrews most likely said "Yahweh", and they took the first syllable, "Yah" as the short form of Jehovah. 

If the reader were to examine Psalm 146 verse 1, (just one of several such examples), the reader would see the verse begin with the expression "Praise ye the LORD" (King James Version). The plural command "Praise Ye" in Hebrew is "Hallelu" and "Yah" is the short form of Jehovah, hence together, "Hallelujah" means "Praise ye the Lord". 

When the Aramaic-speaking translators saw the Hebrew word "Adonai", they simply used "Mar" 'Lord' as the translation. Again, where the translators saw "YHWH" they rendered "MarYah" (alternative spelling "MarJah", though the pronunciation would still be [MarYah]).

I am grateful to these translators for at least preserving a form of YHWH in their translation. However, I want to demonstrate something interesting about affixation in Aramaic. First, however, I will indulge an example of Finnish. The Finnish language is said to be "agglutinative", meaning that endings can be strung to the ends of words. Follow this pattern.

auto 'car'
auto-ssa 'in (the) car'
auto-ssa-ni 'in my car'

Aramaic shares a feature in common with Finnish (and Hebrew, Arabic, and a good many other languages), namely, that possession is expressed by affixing a suffix to the end of the noun rather than by using independent, stand-alone words. Compare English to Finnish and Aramaic:

"My Lord" (English)
"Herra-ni" (Finnish)
"Mar-i" (Aramaic)

All three examples have the same meaning, 'my Lord', but English forms this expression by using two independent words in a single noun phrase, 'my Lord', whereas Finnish and Aramaic accomplish the same objective, but they use a single independent word, "Lord", to which they add a suffix ("ni" in Finnish, "i" in Aramaic) that carries the meaning of 'my'.

Aramaic, the language Jesus spoke, as shown above, used "Mari" to mean 'my Lord', and, as seen at the outset of this blog post, "Maran" to mean 'our Lord'. 

Here is where the case gets interesting. Aramaic speakers would use (depending on their objective) "MarYah" 'Lord Jehovah' or "Mari" 'my Lord' in reference to the Deity, but if these Aramaic speakers wanted to express possession, as in "my Lord" or "our Lord", their only option was to drop the suffix "Yah" and add the possessive ending "i" 'my', "an" 'our', etc. In other words, even if the speaker intended to convey the meaning of "My Lord Jehovah", it appears that it was not normative in Aramaic to say "MarYah-i" but rather "Mari" 'My Lord', without the second component "Yah". 

Now, the reason I am posting this is because, unbeknownst to a good many people, myself until very recently included, Aramaic-speaking Christians preserved New Testament writings in the Aramaic language. It appears that the Gospels and Acts were originally penned in Aramaic, then translated to Greek, and that a large number of New Testament writings may have been prepared for release in both Greek and Aramaic originals, but certainly some portions of the New Testament (such as Jude) were translated from Greek to Aramaic. Scribes later would tweak the Aramaic writings to have them conform with the Greek texts, leading a good many people to conclude that the entire New Testament was written in Greek. However, I find sufficient reason to view the Aramaic New Testament as a mostly reliable reflection of the original writings.

One thing is certain: Jesus spoke Aramaic to his apostles and to the general public, so the record of his addresses in Aramaic have potentially much to offer by way of nuance. I draw your attention to Matthew 22:42-46:

Saying, What think ye of Christ?
whose son is he?
They say unto him,
The Son of David.
He saith unto them,
How then doth David in spirit call him Lord, saying,
The LORD said unto my Lord,
Sit thou on my right hand,
till I make thine enemies thy footstool?
If David then call him Lord,
how is he his son?

Matthew records that the audience was unable to answer Jesus a word and posed no more questions to him from that time forth.

I find it interesting that the King James translators used the all capital "LORD" here, in the New Testament, just as they had in the Old Testament. In the Old Testament "LORD" was their translation of "YHWH" or "Jehovah", but "Lord" was their translation of "Adonai". Sure this passage in Matthew is a quote of Psalm 110:1, where "LORD" indeed stands for "YHWH". However, the Greek text from which our New Testament is translated reads "the Lord said unto the Lord of me" with no terminological distinction between "the LORD" and "my Lord" as we have in our King James Version.

Bear in mind that Jesus did not say this in Greek, but in Aramaic. For this reason the Aramaic New Testament is invaluable for conveying what may have been Jesus' actual words. This passage goes as follows (remember that "MarYah" means 'Lord Jehovah' whereas 'Mari' means either 'my Lord' or 'My Lord Jehovah':

Saying, What think ye of Christ?
whose son is he?
They say unto him,
The Son of David.
He saith unto them,
How then doth David in spirit call him MarYah, saying,
MarYah said unto Mari,
Sit thou on my right hand,
till I make thine enemies thy footstool?
If David then call him MarYah,
how is he his son?

When Jesus states "if David then call him Lord", he is referring to the second "Lord", the one that LORD or Jehovah speaks to saying "Sit thou on my right hand". But did you notice what the Aramaic record witnesses? The Aramaic record witnesses that to Jesus the underlying meaning of "my Lord" was "MarYah" or "Lord Jehovah" for that is precisely how Jesus chooses to rephrase "Mari" 'my Lord'. This would be the rendition in straightforward English:


Saying, What think ye of Christ?
whose son is he?
They say unto him,
The Son of David.
He saith unto them,
How then doth David in spirit call him Lord Jehovah, saying,
Lord Jehovah said unto my Lord (Jehovah),
Sit thou on my right hand,
till I make thine enemies thy footstool?
If David then call him Lord Jehovah,
how is he his son?

This is not something that many Christians will hear over the pulpit nowadays, nor many Jews, nor many Muslims, namely, that the ancient Hebrews believed in Two Jehovahs, the difference between the Two being that One was the Father and the Second His Son. It is conventional for Latter-day Saints today to refer only to Jesus as "Jehovah" and God the Father as "Elohim" (itself one of several Hebrew versions of 'God', but the most frequently used version in the Hebrew Bible). However, even LDS scriptures record Joseph Smith addressing God the Father as "Jehovah" (Section 109:29,34, compare "Holy Father" of verse 29 to "O Jehovah" in verse 34). 

The above citation is not the sole instance of two Jehovahs in either the Old or New Testaments, not to mention The Book of Mormon: Another Testament of Jesus Christ and the Doctrine and Covenants, but this citation is special because in it Jesus uses the depth of expression in Aramaic to make the case that the Messiah was the Lord Jehovah, Son of the Lord Jehovah, as well as a literal descendant of King David. 

That having been said, I love what Jesus repeatedly taught about prayer: "Our Father who art in heaven, hallowed be thy name." With the wealth of beautiful titles for God, the one He chose for us to address Him with is "Father". 

This Father is as real to me, more so, than even my earthly father. My earthly father encouraged me to pray to God, but God bonded me to Him by answering me. I love my earthly dad, and hearing from him makes me happy, but my Heavenly Father is accessible anywhere and at any time, and He brings me peace and joy even when this crazy life of mine should have me going bonkers. 

One last point, Jesus did not start praying to His Father when He was on earth (Matthew 6:9 "Our Father which art in heaven, hallowed be thy name"). Jesus, Jehovah, prayed to Jehovah, His Father, on earth, in front of Moses (Exodus 34:5-6). I will offer the rendition from Hebrew versus the translation from the King James which reflects how perplexed the King James translators were when then scrutinized this passage (possibly wondering how Jehovah could be praying to Jehovah):

And Jehovah descended in the cloud,
and stood with him [Moses] there,
and cried out in the name of Jehovah.
And Jehovah passed by before him, 
and proclaimed, 
Jehovah, Jehovah Elohim is merciful and gracious,
longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth.

So even before His birth from the Virgin Mary, Jesus, "Jehovah", modeled prayer to His Father ("Jehovah"), and modeled the pattern of witnessing to our brethren (and sisters) of the goodness and mercy of our Father.

Happy and peaceful Sabbath Sunday to all!